Wrong Default MediaPublications · From Still in Charge®
On Judgment from Still in Charge®
Who is still doing the thinking, for students and the adults around them.
On Judgment is the newsletter of Still in Charge®, a free AI governance initiative for students, schools and families. Every issue is archived at stillincharge.org.
Every piece on the index
Build It Before You Hand It Over
Uses the calculator, which arrived after children could already do the arithmetic, and a GPS study of lost spatial memory to argue that AI is safe to hand work to only after the skill exists. Gives parents and teachers three questions for checking whether it came first.
Whose Work Is It?
Sets the AI detection game in hiring beside the same game in classrooms, using two hiring-manager surveys, and argues the line that matters is whose work it is. Tells teachers to write the rule down before reaching for a detector and parents how to test a first job application.
Surrender Has a Deadline
Reads MIT's finding that students give in to AI most when a deadline looms alongside Wharton research on what a clock does to accuracy, and sets out what a parent or teacher can do in deadline season to keep the checking switched on.
The Fear Is Real. It Is Aimed at the Wrong Decade.
Takes the polling on fear that AI could threaten human survival seriously, argues it is aimed at a decade a parent cannot reach, and sets out what a parent can do this school year to keep the deciding in a child's hands.
Only If They Notice When Something Is Wrong
Reads the Common Sense Media survey of kids and AI as counting what kids recognized rather than what they were shown, argues every adult safety plan works only if the kid notices first, and sets out how to practice that noticing at home and in class.
The Pause Is the Easy Part
Reads New York City's one-year pause on generative AI in its schools as the easy half, and asks what ninety minutes of AI literacy can build before the pause ends.
What the Agreement Actually Says
Walks a parent through fifteen minutes with an AI study app's agreement: who actually operates it, where its promises stop, and what happens to the work a student submits, using three real products' public terms.
An Answer Is Not Understanding
Traces how a correct answer once required the understanding beneath it, and what to ask for now that the link is broken.
The Hours Were Never the Problem
Sets a screen time limit against the question it never asks, which is what the product was built to do to the child while it had their attention.
You Cannot Check Everything
Rejects verifying every AI answer as an impossible standard, and asks what has to survive instead: the trigger that says which answer deserves a check.
Cognitive Drift: The Failure You Only See Looking Back
Distinguishes a single displaced decision from the slow accumulated loss those moments add up to, which is only visible in hindsight.
What the Research Actually Says About AI and Student Thinking
Summarizes the evidence behind judgment displacement, including cognitive offloading, in plain language and what it means for a classroom.
The Dinner-Table Question
Offers one question a parent can ask when the work itself will not reveal whether the student did the thinking.
Your AI Policy Sets the Rules. It Does Not Build the Judgment.
Argues an acceptable-use policy governs the room but cannot build the judgment a student carries when nobody is enforcing it.
The Two Jobs You Keep
Separates the work a student can hand to a tool from the two things that cannot be handed over: the moment of deciding, and the habit of checking.
Judgment Displacement: The Risk We Keep Missing
Names the risk as whether the tool takes the seat where a student's judgment belongs, rather than how many hours they spend with it.
The Case for Funding Student AI Safety
Makes the July 2026 case for companies to fund student AI safety as recognition rather than influence; the page itself now notes that funding model was retired and the program takes no money.
Everyone Is Regulating the Machine. The Danger Is Inside the Child.
Sets a finding that AI's risks to children now outweigh the benefits against regulation that aims only at the machine.
Neil deGrasse Tyson, a Last Meal, and the Other 15%
Uses a public figure catching an AI's wrong answers to ask what judgment has to be built first for anyone to do the same.
Where the Laws Stop Short
Reads the direction of AI regulation and marks the half that lives inside the student, which no law reaches.
While We Argue About Screen Time
Argues the question is not how much a student uses AI, but where the tool sits relative to their own judgment.
Why I Built Still in Charge
Explains why the restriction debate misses the point: what a student is shown the tool is for decides whether they keep their judgment.
Judgment Displacement
Defines the core risk as the tool taking the seat where a student's judgment should sit, and sets out the response the later essays develop.